Friday, January 29, 2010

Radical cleric Foad Farahi appeals for asylum in the U.S. with the help of the American wing of The Muslim Brotherhood (MAS)

On his facebook page Imam Foad Farahi writes that he is a fan of radical hate clerics Yusuf Al Qaradawi ,Tariq Al Suweidan and bin Laden protege Ahmed Deedat. He was slated for deportation and classified as a Level 3 threat. Farahi is fighting to stay in the United States and claim asylum. The Muslim American Society (MAS) The American wing of the Muslim Brotherhood is in the forefront of providing Farahi with legal aid and keeping his case in the public eye.

"It [MAS] is the de facto arm of the Muslim Brotherhood in the U.S.," said Steven Emerson, director of the Investigative Project on Terrorism. "The agenda of the MAS is to ... impose Islamic law in the U.S., to undermine U.S. counterterrorism policy."

The MAS was founded by members of the Muslim Brotherhood, an international Islamist movement created in Egypt in 1928. Radical members of the Brotherhood founded the terror group Hamas and were among the first members of Al Qaeda.

The Muslim American Society's former secretary general has acknowledged that the group was founded by the Brotherhood, and in 2004 he estimated that about half of MAS members were in the Muslim Brotherhood. http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/01/08/rep-ellison-makes-pilgrimage-paid-group-critics-extremism/

(Not surprisingly Farahi lists MAS president Esam Omeish as his favorite politician on his facebook page).

Here is some information on the three of the clerics which Foahi claims to be a "fan" of.

"A leading Islamic cleric , al-Qaradawi also promises that eventually Islam will prevail over all other religions and a single Islamic state will rule the world.

Al-Qaradawi says some countries will fall to the armed Islamic jihad, but in others, such as the United States, victory will come through Da'awa - the teaching of Islam to non-Muslims - which will trigger Westerners to convert to Islam "in droves."

"We will conquer Europe, we will conquer America! Not through (the) sword, but through Da'awa," al-Qaradawi told members of the Muslim Arab Youth Association at the group's 1995 convention in Toledo, Ohio.

"Jihad can be with the pen and the tongue just as it can be with the sword and the spear. Islamic Jihad is not limited to military efforts only; it extends beyond this, including several means that Muslims need to utilize now more than ever."http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/001104.php

Tariq Al Suiwedan is a Kuwaiti cleric who was banned from entering the United States. At a "Young Muslims Conference" in 2000 Suweidan stated:

#

"...even if a civilization is ready to crumble (such as the West, with all the characteristics of deterioration of past fallen empires), it will NOT fall until we, the Muslims, strive to give it that last push, the last straw that will break the camel's back." http://www.militantislammonitor.org/article/id/1470

"A SA Islamic activist has forged strong ties with the Bin Laden family, receiving substantial funding from them and, in the process, meeting Osama bin Laden, the man named as prime suspect in this week's terror attacks.

Yousuf Deedat, 45, who triggered a storm when he distributed thousands of anti-Semitic handbills featuring a picture of Adolf Hitler during the World Conference Against Racism in Durban last week, said he first met Bin Laden in 1989.

Deedat and his father, Muslim scholar Ahmed Deedat, met Bin Laden on several other occasions in Saudi Arabia that year and in the 1990s while they were drumming up support for the Islamic Propagation Centre International in Durban.

"He was quiet-spoken, respectful and humble. When he met my father, he did not look him in the eye. That is the greatest honour an Arab can bestow on an elder," said Deedat.

The Deedats have had close links with the Bin Laden family since first meeting Osama's elder brother, Sheikh Bakr bin Laden, in 1986. Since then, many of the 27 Bin Laden brothers have contributed generously to the centre. Sheikh Bakr alone gave the centre $3.1-million over eight years to buy a building, print the Koran in English and Zulu, and print and distribute Islamic literature.

In appreciation, the Deedats named their building in Durban's Victoria Street after the family in 1988.

During his tenure as secretary-general of the propagation centre, the Bin Ladens reportedly paid Yousuf Deedat a monthly salary of R900 000.

Deedat said Bin Laden had invited him on a number of occasions to attend his lectures in Saudi Arabia. "He moved me to tears. He was a man of few words, but when he spoke in public, he had this magnetic effect on all who listened to him." Whether he was guilty or not, Deedat said, the US would always use him as a scapegoat". http://www.militantislammonitor.org/article/id/365

#

While his case is pending Farahi has been waging jihad through da'wa by speaking at interfaith events like the one depicted in the article below entitled :" Imam Foad Farahi explains Faith to Christian and Jewish seniors".

MIM:Farahi is the Imam of the Shamshuddin Islamic Center in North Miami Beach which is affiliated with AMANA (The American Muslim Association of North America) run by Sofian Abdelaziz Zakkout. One of the directors of the center was Gulshair Shukrijumah, the father of dirty bomber wannabe Adnan Shukrijumah and an Islamist in his own right. Shukrijumah was a character witness for Clement Hampton El who was convicted of plotting a 'Day of Terror' in New York in 1993 together with the Blind Sheik Umar Abdul Rahman.

[Zakkout's] affinity for terrorists has prompted him to host fundraisers for groups like Islamic Relief and become vice president of the Health Resource Center for Palestine- which openly solicited funds for the IAP [Islamic Association of Palestine the American wing of Hamas] on it's website. Besides hiring the father of dirty bomber wannabe Adnan Shukrijumah, Sofian also frequented mosques where terrorists worshipped such as Dar Ul Uloom in Pembroke Pines. Zakkout claims that he is a 'volunteer consultant to law enforcement' which really means he tells them that every terrorist he meets is a victim of discrimination and profiling.

In 2003 Zakkout told a journalist that:

I saw (El Shukrijumah, Padilla and Mandhai) at different times in different mosques, and I always said hello. Does that make me a terrorist?" http://www.militantislammonitor.org/article/id/927

--------------------------

Foad Farahi's fan list on his facebook page is a Who's Who of hardcore Islamists.

http://www.facebook.com/people/Foad-Farahi/542716898

Celebrities / Public Figures Government Officials Politicians Music

* السيدة عائشة رضي الله عنها
* Mishary Rashid Al-Afasy
* Yusuf Al-Qaradawi
* Ahmed Deedat
* Tareq Al-Suwaidan



* RAJAB TAYIB ARDOGAN
* Basbakan Recep Tayyip Erdogan
* Esam Omeish



* RAJAB TAYIB ARDOGAN
* Basbakan Recep Tayyip Erdogan
* Esam Omeish



* Yusuf (aka Cat Stevens)

IMAM FOAD FARAHI Explains Faith to Christian and Jewish Seniors


By Jaweed Kaleem MIAMI, FL (MiamiHerald.com) March 28, 2009

The audience was just what you would expect in a Presbyterian church fellowship hall: mostly white and elderly. The speakers were not. Two Muslim imams, one African-American and the other Kuwaiti-born, were there to lead Islam 101.

Foad Farahi spoke first, softly and in Arabic: Bismillah al-rahman al-rahim. "We can't hear you!" interjected a woman in the audience. "I think he's saying a prayer," said a woman seated nearby.

Close enough. Farahi was sharing a common Islamic refrain: In the name of God, most Gracious, most Compassionate. Sandwiched between sessions on Judaism and Presbyterianism, this Wednesday night class was part of a series called Religious Traditions sponsored by the University of Miami's Osher Lifelong Learning Institute. Osher offers low-cost classes for senior citizens on subjects including photography, memory enhancement and music appreciation. Most meet at the university's Coral Gables campus, but the institute branched out to Miami Shores last fall.

Religious Traditions, which also covers Catholics, Quakers, Hindus and Unitarians, has attracted about 30 students to each one-hour session. A $10 fee includes dinner. While most mosques and churches are open to the public and interfaith dialogue is as old as the Silk Road, the discussion of Islam was a rare exchange among people from deeply different backgrounds.

The African-American imam, Nasir Ahmed, 61, who lives in Sebastian and practices oral surgery at a Treasure Coast clinic, leads Friday prayers at the Al-Ansar mosque in Liberty City. Ahmed, who was raised Catholic and adopted a Muslim name when he converted, spoke with the fiery flare of a Sunday preacher. "No matter what you call God, the best of all names are his," he proclaimed.

Farahi, 34, a graduate student in dietetics and nutrition at Florida International University, leads prayers at Masjid Shamsuddin, a storefront mosque in North Miami Beach.

SHARED HERITAGE

Wearing glasses and a trim black beard, Farahi read English translations from a Koran and pointed out the shared heritage of Judaism and Islam. "Jews, Muslims, we believe they are brothers from different mothers, if you could say that," Farahi said, because both groups descended from Abraham. The imams took turns fielding questions. "How many times do you pray?" asked Stephen Loffredo, 56, of Miami Shores. Muslims pray five times a day, including once in the mosque on Fridays, Ahmed said as he got down on the floor to demonstrate prostration. Audience members rose from their seats and peered over each others' shoulders for a good look.

"But how do women fit into your religion?" asked Rose Voyce, 70, of North Miami, who had been to a mosque in Turkey and "never saw any women in it." "The mosque is the whole earth," Ahmed replied, adding that Muslims can pray almost anywhere. Women are not required to come to the mosque, but can come and sit in a separate area, he said. "What do you do about non-observant Muslims?" asked Tom Harrington, 79, as he flipped through pages of a Koran. Don't push the religion on them, the imams agreed. "I have 15 brothers and sisters — all Christians — so I'm pretty outnumbered," Ahmed said. Afterward, several in the audience, which included Jews as well as Christians, said they had found the class enlightening.

"You can only play so much cards and see so many movies. I get quite bored," said June Newbauer, 83, a retired real estate agent who lives in North Miami. "The Middle East has been such an interest in our country with the war. It's very timely." Farahi, who often speaks to college students, said addressing an older audience in a church setting was a first for him. "People need to get together and talk and look at our similarities, especially when you live in such a diverse society," he said. "Don't worry about who is right or wrong."

RELATED CLASSES

Religious Traditions is among a handful of classes, including an overview of Middle Eastern politics and history, that Osher is offering in Miami Shores. "You can go to a university and get an academic view," said Noreen Frye, Osher director, "but it makes sense to bring clergy into contact with each other and teach people in religious environment. It's the perfect place for it." http://www.masnet.org/masnews.asp?id=5326

--------------------------------------------------------------------

http://www.masnet.org/news.asp?id=4617
MAS Freedom Concerned About Gov't Targeting of Immigrant Muslim Activists and Clergy for Voluntary Departure

Date Posted: Thursday, December 13, 2007

Foad Farahi, Imam Shamsuddin Islamic Center of North Miami Beach, Florida, since April 2001.

By Aishah Schwartz

CORRECTION: Attorney John Pratt was originally named in error; the correct name of the attorney is Ira J. Kurzban, Esq., of Kurzban, Kurzban, Weinger & Tetzeli, P.A.

WASHINGTON, DC – Dec. 12, 2007 - (MASNET) MAS Freedom (MASF) Executive Director, Mahdi Bray, will attend a hearing in the Southern District Court of Florida on Thursday, Dec. 13, 2007 to monitor the deportation case of Foad Farahi vs. USA, et. al.

Farahi, 33, was arrested by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) on November 26, 2007 and detained at the Krome Detention Center. The arrest classified Farahi as a Level-3 threat, usually applied to those convicted of high crimes or aggravated felonies, of which Farahi has been never charged or convicted in either category. The arrest would ordinarily have been classified as a Level-1 immigration violation, a result of unrecognized pending legal matters regarding Farahi's application for asylum.

A citizen of Iran, born and raised in Kuwait, Farahi first came to the U.S. 14-years ago at the age of 18, on a Student (F-1) Visa. He completed his bachelor in chemistry at Barry University in 2002, and subsequently obtained his masters degree in Public Health from Florida International University where he is currently a Ph.D. candidate. Farahi has also worked as an Imam at Shamsuddin Islamic Center of North Miami Beach, Florida, since April 2001, and is a member of the Barry University interfaith committee.

Farahi applied for asylum (from Iran) in August of 2002 and is qualified for Withholding of Removal and Convention Against Torture (CAT) according the U.N. Geneva Convention. However, his asylum proceedings have been delayed on numerous occasions over the past few years, until October 23, 2007, when he appeared at a hearing and was asked to withdraw his petition in exchange for being granted 30-days to voluntarily leave the country or face arrest on charges of supporting terrorist groups.

Even if Farahi wanted to leave the country within the designated 30-days it is not possible. He has applied for asylum from Iran, his passport expired March 11, 2007, and there is insufficient time to renew a visa to Kuwait; to which he has no right to return, although he was born there - he does not hold Kuwaiti citizenship.

Farahi has filed two appeals with the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA), the most recent being on November 21, 2007. ICE reportedly has denied any knowledge of Farahi's BIA appeals, however he was released from Krome Detention Center on a $15,000 bond December 4, 2007.

Attorney Ira J. Kurzban has filed an Emergency Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and/or Preliminary Injunctive Relief on Farahi's behalf, petitioning the court for a Temporary Restraining Order that would protect him from being moved to a detention center outside of the State of Florida, to grant him relief from detention pending final ruling on his removal proceedings and for his case to be re-examined due to depravation of his constitutional right of due process, and for not being offered the right to ask for Withholding of Removal and Convention Against Torture, despite known human rights violations in Iran.

The primary concern now is that the U.S. government could pressure BIA to make a quick decision (a process that typically takes months and sometimes years) in denying Farahi's appeals, the consequence being that he would be taken into immediate custody and processed for deportation to Iran.

Radical Islamist groups in America laud Obama speech

Radical Islamists groups in the United States have unanimously lauded President Barak Obama's speech in Cairo last week. His unprecedented dhimmitude was seen as a victory for Islamists worldwide.

"Symbolically this speech served to whitewash Islam's many controversial aspects while undermining America's ability to positively affect the political/religious discourse in the Middle East.

In retrospect, calling this event disastrous might be seen as an understatement." http://www.pipelinenews.org/index.cfm?page=obamaid=6.4.09%2Ehtm

(WASHINGTON, D.C., 6/4/09) - A prominent national Islamic civil rights and advocacy group called President Obama's historic address to the Muslim world today in Cairo "comprehensive, balanced and forthright" and said it may help reverse the deterioration in relations between the United States and Muslim-majority nations. The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) hosted a live viewing this morning of the president's speech for leaders and members of the Muslim community in the Washington, D.C., area. (CAIR chapters around the nation are holding similar viewings.) For a transcript of the president's speech, go here.

SEE ALSO: Obama Speech in Cairo Pleases American Muslims
Obama Speech Hits Home in Orange County (Orange County Register)
Sacramento Muslims React to Obama's Speech

In a statement following that viewing, CAIR said:

"President Obama's comprehensive, bala nced and forthright address covered almost all the bases in terms of issues of concern to Americans, American Muslims and those in Muslim-majority nations. It may serve as a turning point in what have been deteriorating relations between America and the Muslim world. "We believe the president's call for a ‘new beginning' in relations between the United States and Muslims worldwide will be well-received by all people of good will. We agree with the president that the ‘cycle of suspicion and discord must end.' "By quoting the Quran on issues such as diversity, justice and the sanctity of human life, the president acknowledged Islam's contributions to universal values. "CAIR appreciates the president's acknowledgment of the contributions American Muslims have made and continue to make to our nation and to the protection of civil rights. We applaud the president's commitment to work with American Muslims to ensure that they can fulfill their religious obligation of charitable giving.

SEE: Muslim Americans Serving in the U.S. Government
"American Muslims also appreciate the president's statement that ‘Islam is part of America' and his defense of the right to wear religious attire such as the Islamic headscarf, or hijab. President Obama seemingly referenced a case made public by CAIR when he said the United States government has gone to court to protect the right of women and girls to wear the hijab.' (In 2004, CAIR welcomed a U.S. Department of Justice decision to support the right of an Oklahoma student who was suspended because of her headscarf. A CAIR alert about the girl's suspension drew international media attention.) "We back the president's call for the rejection of religious extremism and his support for the spread of representative government, the right to religious freedom and the right of women worldwide to equal rights and opportunities." "We particularly appreciate the president's challenge to those who promote ‘crude stereotypes' of Islam in the West and of those who harbor similar stereotypes of America. "President Obama set a new tone for American policy in the Middle East when he emphasized that America will not turn its back on ‘the legitimate Palestinian aspiration for dignity, opportunity and a state of their own.' His statement that ‘the United States does not accept the legitimacy of continued Israeli settlements' sends a clear message to those who would block peace with justice in the region. "We ask that people of all faiths in this nation and around the world use the opportunity presented by this important address to turn the page of history and to join together based on ‘mutual interest and mutual respect' to create a m ore peaceful and prosperous future. CAIR and the American Muslim community look forward to working with President Obama to carry out the ambitious agenda he laid out in today's address."

CAIR is calling on American Muslims and other people of conscience to contact the White House to express support for the new direction outlined in the president's address. Last week, CAIR released an open letter in English and Arabic to President Obama and to the Muslim world offering specific policy recommendations for the president's address in Cairo. CAIR, America's largest Muslim civil liberties and advocacy organization, has 35 offices and chapters nationwide and in Canada. Its mission is to enhance the understanding of Islam, encourage dialogue, protect civil liberties, empower American Muslims, and build coalitions that promote justice and mutual understanding. - END - CONTACT: CAIR National Communications Director Ibrahim Hooper, 202-488-8787, 202-744-7726, E-Mail: ihooper@cair.com; CAIR Communications Coordinator Amina Rubin, 202-488-8787, 202-341-4171, E-Mail: arubin@cair.com; CAIR National Legislative Director Corey Saylor, 202-384-8857, E-Mail: csaylor@cair.com

http://www.cair.com/ArticleDetails.aspx?ArticleID=25953&&name=n&&currPage=1

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

President Obama's Cairo Speech is a Foundation for Mutual Recognition and Positive Engagement

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

The Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) welcomes the new approach toward the Middle East and the Muslim world outlined in President Obama's speech which he delivered today at Cairo University, Egypt. The language and tone of the speech, and the seven issues he addressed, provide a new and fresh start to improve relations with Muslim countries and address serious problems that threatens American security, prosperity, and standing in the world.

We are=2 0particularly pleased with the President's acknowledgement of the positive contribution the Islamic faith and Muslim peoples have made to world civilization, as well as with his recognition of the important contributions the growing Muslim American community has made, and continues to make, to America's well-being and prosperity. It is refreshing to see President Obama shift the focus from differences among religious traditions to common values and aspirations.

We applaud the President's recognition of the problems Muslim American charities have been having and the hardship that resulted from the "rules on charitable giving" by federal agencies. We welcome his commitment to ensure that Muslim Americans can fulfill their zakat duty, a religious obligation to provide the needy with financial support.

"President Barak Obama's speech demonstrates that there is no essential dichotomy between America and Islam," ISNA President Ingrid Mattson stated in response to the speech. "The vast majority of Muslims across the world share with Americans the same aspirations to political freedom, economic prosperity and security for themselves and their families," she stressed.

ISNA agrees with the President that violent extremism is a plague that threatens world peace and security, and stands fully behind his efforts to confront it and protect American life and property. We further commend him for recognizing that defeating violent extremism cannot be achieved b y solely relying on military means, but that it requires a comprehensive strategy that addresses the grievances that give rise to anger, disillusion and discontent, including injustice, poverty, occupation, and dictatorship.

We share with the President a belief in the importance of coming to terms with significant historical conflicts and injustices, including colonialism, the Holocaust and the terrorist attacks of 9/11. These events have placed our communities in various positions of conflict. Muslims, Jews, Americans and others have all, at various times, been hurt and have sometimes responded to injustice in ways that violate our own principles and values. We come to terms with the past not to be mired in the past, but to be able to move forward to work for peace. We welcome the recognition that the aspirations of the Palestinian people, like those of the Israelis, for security, dignity and statehood are legitimate.

We agree with the President that the desired change in relations between the United States and Muslim countries will not happen as the result of statements and speeches, but welcome this vision of a new way forward. We commit to working with other Americans to take the necessary steps to translate his words with action.

Finally, we appreciate the President's recognition of the importance of interfaith cooperation for the common good. ISNA is committed to contribute our share for creating understanding, cooperation, and trust among Muslim Ameri cans and their compatriots who follow other faiths. We have been engaged in vigorous interfaith dialogue for many years with Christian and Jewish communities, and we believe that at no time in the history of the United States has an expansion of this effort been so important to security and peace and prosperity.

Contact:
Louay Safi, ILDC Executive Director
louay@isna.net
(317) 839-1807
http://www.isna.net/articles/News/President-Obamas-Cairo-Speech.aspx

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

http://www.icna.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=83

ICNA Welcomes President Obama's Historical Speech

June 04, 2009

The Islamic Circle of North America (ICNA) today welcomed the speech made by President Barack Obama in Cairo, Egypt, and issued the following statement:

"The America that was envisioned by the founding fathers was presented in reality for the first time as President Barack Obama delivered his historical speech at Cairo University on June 4, 2009. The President showed his respect for Islam and Muslims and presented the true picture of Islam. His speech made the American Muslim community proud of their country and their president.

Dr. Zahid Bukhari, President of the Islamic Circle of North America, said, "President Obama has very wisely presented his vision of this global village that we all call our world. He has touched upon the sensitive issues in a careful yet dignified manner. His speech was historical in all regards. The Muslim world has been ignored by the previous administration , causing great harm to the image of America not only in the eyes of over 1.5 billion Muslims worldwide but also in the eyes of all those just and peace-loving citizens of the world. Presi dent Obama's speech presents a great shift in American foreign policy."

In his speech, President Obama vowed not to tolerate Islamophobia of any kind when he said, "I have known Islam on three continents before coming to the region where it was first revealed. That experience guides my conviction that partnership between America and Islam must be based on what Islam is, not what it isn't. And I consider it part of my responsibility as President of the United States to fight against negative stereotypes of Islam wherever they appear."

The president also said, "So let there be no doubt: Islam is a part of America. And I believe that America holds within her the truth that regardless of race, religion, or station in life, all of us share common aspirations – to live in peace and security; to get an education and to work with dignity; to love our families, our communities, and our God. These things we share. This is the hope of all humanity."

ICNA hopes that President Obama will make all efforts to bring an end to the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and will bring the American troops back home. We believe that the suffering of the Palestinian people must come to an end and President Obama has the ability, support and vision to do just that. We also hope that the American foreign policy will support and strengthen democratic Muslim countries.

- END -

Pr ess Contact: Naeem Beig
Vice President for Public Affairs

Islamic Circle of North America
e-mail: naeembaig@gmail.com This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
Office: (718) 658-1199 Extension: 102
Cell: (917) 202-2118

-------------------------------------

'A New Beginning' - MPAC Welcomes President Obama's Speech to The Muslim World

June 04, 2009

(Click on link to see video of press conference)

http://www.mpac.org/article.php?id=824

Earlier today, the Muslim Public Affairs Council held a press conference in response to President Barak Obama's speech in Cairo, Egypt. MPAC leaders hailed the speech as an essential new beginning in Unites States Policy and relationships with the Muslim world.

"The President proved he is the best ambassador for America to the Muslim world," said MPAC Senior Advisor Dr. Maher Hathout. "He demonstrated admirable leadership by addressing issues others are hesitant to explore."

President Obama's speech distinguished his administration as willing to seriously engage in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. This break from tradition is not only refreshing but highly encouraging. His statement on settlements in the Occupied Territories is a complete shift in policy that gives peace a chance for success.

"Our President's message was clear, he aims to change U.S. foreign policy while asking the Muslim world to re-orient their views towards the United States," said MPAC Executive Director, Salam Al-Marayati. This shift is a profoundly different approach from past administrations. "By speaking to the pain and challenges of Muslim people's around the globe, President Obama, is effectively winning Muslim hearts and minds. The new approach is essential in gaining confidence and building a solid relationship between the Unites States and the Muslim world. More importantly, President Obama today dealt a severe blow to bin Laden."

"Responsibility now lays on the shoulders of all of us, as American citizens, to support and implement the President's plan and to see his promises actualized," said MPAC Southern California Government Relations Director, Aziza Hasan. A well-articulated message of genuine respect, MPAC calls on all people to join the President's hopeful tone and ability to reach out and connect to all people. "By quoting the Quran and Islamic history, President Obama demonstrated a willingness and interest in the Muslim world that allows for greater understanding and harmony. He addressed difficult issues head-on while remaining respectful. This new tone, paves an essential path towards a new beginning."

--------------------------------------------------------

http://www.adc.org/index.php?id=3456

ADC Commends President Obama's Historic Speech in Cairo

Washington, DC | June 4th, 2009 | www.adc.org | The American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee commends remarks delivered by the President of the United States in a historic speech on U.S. relations with the Arab and Muslim World this morning in Cairo.

The President, who had made a commitment as a candidate, to deliver an important address to the people of the Arab and Muslim world in the early days of his Presidency fulfilled that promise today. In that address, President Obama touched on a number of key issues in the relationship between the United States, the Muslim World and the entire population of the world.

By acknowledging the accomplishments and contributions of Islamic civilization, the President already began to fulfill his commitment to dispel harmful and inaccurate stereotypes about Arab and Muslims throughout the world, an effort at the center of ADC's mission for the past 29 years. Also, President Obama's commitment to help Muslim Americans fulfill their religious obligation through charitable giving supports an ongoing ADC objective.

The President's speech in Cairo is one of the first major steps in improved relations based on "mutual interests and mutual respect." Of the many issues addressed by the President, many in Arab and Muslim communities in the Middle East and the United States waited anxiously to hear his remarks on the Israeli-Palestinian issue. ADC commends his approach to the Israel-Palestinian conflict which recognizes the 60-plus years of suffering and dispossession that Palestinians have experienced.

Furthermore, his continued commitment to end torture, close the prison camp at Guantanamo Bay, support women's rights and safeguard the civil rights of all persons protected by the Constitution, projects an image of American values which is held in high regard, not only by Arabs and Muslims, but by people throughout the world.

ADC looks forward to administration's continued efforts to make changes in the policies of the past eight years that reflect the hopeful sentiment and mutual respect which were featured in the President's remarks this morning. As Arab-Americans, ambassadors between both worlds, ADC looks forward to working with the President's Administration domestically to bolster the message he delivered in Cairo and have a direct impact on the lives of Arab and Muslim Americans.
###


NOTE TO EDITORS: The American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee (ADC), which is non sectarian and non partisan, is the largest Arab-American civil rights organization in the United States. It was founded in 1980, by former Senator James Abourezk to protect the civil rights of people of Arab descent in the United States and to promote the cultural heritage of the Arabs. ADC has 38 chapters nationwide, including chapters in every major city in the country, and members in all 50 states.

The ADC Research Institute (ADC-RI), which was founded in 1981, is a Section 501(c)(3) educational organization that sponsors a wide range of programs on behalf of Arab Americans and of importance to all Americans. ADC-RI programs include research studies, seminars, conferences and publications that document and analyze the discrimination faced by Arab Americans in the workplace, schools, media, and governmental agencies and institutions. ADC-RI also celebrates the rich cultural heritage of the Arabs.
__________________________________________
Contact: Yousef Munayyer

American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee | www.adc.org
1732 Wisconsin Ave., NW | Washington, DC | 20007
Tel: 202-244-2990 | Fax: 202-244-7968 | E-mail: media@adc.org

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

MIM: The United Voices for America a CAIR spin off group founded by former head of CAIR Tampa Ahmed Bedier , also praised Obama's speech.

Tell Congress To Support President Obama's Vision for a New Beginning with Muslim World

Last week, President Obama gave a remarkable speech in Cairo, Egypt, where he stated to a worldwide audience America's desire to establish "common ground" and a "new beginning" with the Muslim world.

However, the President's vision is now under attack by critics here at home. Let's send a message to Washington that we're tired of the politics of fear and we want a new beginning. CLICK HERE TO TAKE ACTION.

Obama's most memorable quote deals with his "new beginning" theme that tied his entire speech together. "I have come here to seek a new beginning between the United States and Muslims around the world," he said. "One based upon mutual interest and mutual respect; and one based upon the truth that America and Islam are not exclusive, and need not be in competition. Instead, they overlap, and share common principles - principles of justice and progress; tolerance and the dignity of all human beings."

Obama's message should inspire us all to action. Unfortunately, vocal critics are attacking Obama's vision and claim his speech was too apologetic and un-American. Those groups are working hard to undermine the president's new initiative.

All over the world countries are meeting Obama's speech with high praise and optimism for establishing a roadway to peace and understanding with people of all races and nations. It is our obligation to ensure our elected officials understand and support Obama's message.

It is your turn to call on Congress to openly support the President in his efforts to foster stronger relations between America and the Muslim world. Only through OUR collective sustained efforts of a "new beginning" can we establish the worldwide peace necessary to end the destructive war in Iraq, build diplomatic relations with Iran, and end the impending conflict with Afghanistan.

ACT NOW: CLICK HERE TO WATCH OUR VIDEO, WRITE YOUR LEADERS AND URGE THEIR OUTWARD SUPPORT FOR OBAMA'S HISTORIC SPEECH AND NEW BEGINNING WITH THE MUSLIM WORLD. IT TAKES LESS THAN 30-SECONDS.
http://unitedvoices.com/anb

Regards,

Mohammad Sherif
United Voices For America

PS: Spread the word, ask all your friends to watch the video and sign their own letter.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

MIM: Islamists abroad also reacted positively to Obama's speech.

http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5jAM0IAMXGj3MT72RxJQhVkmyV81wD98LUUKO0
Some militants respond positively to Obama speech

By KARIN LAUB – 3 hours ago RAMALLAH, West Bank (AP) — From Lebanese guerrillas to Saudi preachers, Islamic extremists have warned followers not to be taken in by President Barack Obama's conciliatory words — a sign that some may be nervous about losing support if animosity toward the U.S. fades. But even moderates warn Obama will have to quickly follow his call for a new relationship with the Islamic world with bold actions to prevent a disappointed backlash.

In his speech in Cairo Thursday, Obama listed confronting "violent extremism" as the top priority in addressing tensions between the U.S. and Muslims. He urged the Islamic world to reject radical ideologies and promised to work aggressively to end the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. He also said the U.S. does not accept the legitimacy of continued Israeli settlement in the West Bank and endorsed a Palestinian state. There are already some indications his words are having the desired effect of undercutting extremists. A militant leader in Egypt called on the Taliban to respond positively to Obama's gestures, and Hamas militants in Gaza say they are ready "to build on this speech."

Obama may have managed to "plant the seed of doubt in some minds" of extremists, said Robert Malley, senior analyst at the International Crisis Group think tank. "There was enough ... that represented openings for those who wanted openings." Yet Obama's eloquent promises were seen as only a small step toward halting the region's drift toward militancy, accelerated in recent years by the U.S. invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan and Washington's perceived pro-Israel bias. He will be most closely watched on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, particularly his push to get Israel to comply with a settlement freeze. That is something no U.S. administration before him has accomplished.

"Extremists will only be disarmed when the U.S. takes a more neutral stand on Israel," said Abdel Wahab al-Qasab, a Qatar-based analyst. Obama has so far followed the Bush administration's policy of not talking directly to Hamas, which the U.S. regards as a terrorist organization. But in his remarks in Cairo, he seemed to suggest some basis for believing that Palestinian militants who rule Gaza might be drawn into the peace process.

Obama's Mideast envoy George Mitchell is coming to the region this week to push the president's agenda with Israelis and Palestinians. He is tentatively scheduled to stop in Syria, where Hamas is headquartered. But a State Department spokesman said Mitchell has no plans to talk to Hamas. Obama's message al so contained an assurance that U.S. troops in Afghanistan fighting al-Qaida and the Taliban won't stay longer than absolutely necessary. That too may have resonated with militants in that region, said Ahmed Rashid, a Lahore-based analyst and author of a book on the Taliban. "The extremists used to lie that the U.S. wants military bases in this region," he said. Essam Derbala, a leader of one of Egypt's largest militant groups, al-Gamaa al-Islamiyya Al-Qaida, told an Egyptian newspaper over the weekend that the Taliban should reciprocate by announcing they will no longer target Americans. That would ensure U.S. troops will eventually leave the region, he said. Still, many extremists remain wary of the U.S outreach.

Two influential fundamentalist groups, Lebanon's Iranian-backed Hezbollah and Egypt's opposition Muslim Brotherhood, as well as a Saudi preacher, accused Obama of being deceptive. They said he offered soft words to hide unchanged anti-Muslim positions. But that could indicate their nervousness that Obama's strategy could undercut support for militancy. This week's elections in Lebanon and Iran could give an early indication of sentiments in the region. In Lebanon, Shiite militant group Hezbollah and its allies tried to unseat a pro-Western coalition in a vote on Sunday. In Iran's June 12 vote, hard-line President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is facing a pro-reform challenger likely to take a less confrontational approach with the U.S. if elected. But what many in the Muslim world will be waiting to see is whether Obama delivers on expectations of a tougher U.S. stance toward Israel. "If the Israelis continue with settlement activity and defiance and President Obama does nothing, the repercussions will be major," said Saeb Erekat, an aide to Western-backed Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas. "We're at a crossroads."

While seemingly tougher on Israel than his predecessor George W. Bush, Obama has not said what, if any, action would take if Israel defies him on settlements. He also has made clear that he is not dramatically revising the fundamentals of past U.S. policy. Like Bush, he remains committed to Israel's security, is banking on the unpopular Abbas and refuses to talk to Abbas' rival, Hamas, unless the Islamic militant group recognizes Israel and renounces violence. Despite disappointment that the U.S. position had not shifted more dramatically, Hamas leaders praised Obama's shift in tone. Hamas is eager to win international acceptance of its rule in Gaza, and has gone out of its way to sound pragmatic. "We think we can build on this speech," Hamas spokesman Fawzi Barhoum said Saturday. "We can take positive things from the speech to open communications with Obama and the U.S. administration." In the end, many Muslims were heartened by Obama's speech because they saw it as a significant change in the tone of discourse with Muslims. They noted he did not use the word "terrorism" or "terrorist" once in the 55-minute address — words that many thought had been devalued under the Bush administration and too often equated with Muslims. They also heard a more respectful U.S. leader who quoted from the Quran, or Islamic holy book, greeted them in Arabic, and removed his shoes when he toured a Cairo mosque.

One militant Web site that often carries statements from al-Qaida had unusual praise for Obama after the speech, noting his quotations from the Quran demonstrated respect for Islam and branding him the "wise enemy." AP reporters from across the Middle East contributed to this report.

CAIR and ISNA: Zero Degrees of Separation

CAIR and ISNA zero degrees of separation

In January the Islamic Circle of North America issued a press release that their new Secretary General was Safaa Zazour, the former board president and chairman of the Council on American Islamic Relations in Chicago(CAIR).http://www.isna.net/articles/News/ISNA-Announces-New-Secretary-General-with-Long-Record-of-Service-and-Achievement.aspx

The press release entitled 'ISNA Announces New Secretary General with Long Record of Service and Achievement' included a bio of Zazour. However the document failed to mention that he had been the chairman and a board member of Chicago CAIR.

The Council on American Islamic Relations was named as an unindicted co-conspirator in the successful prosecution of Hamas funder the Holy Land Foundation.

"Last autumn, FBI field offices began notifying state CAIR chapters that bureau officials could no longer meet with them until CAIR's national leadership in Washington had addressed issues raised by the HLF trial, according to people with knowledge of the notifications."

http://www.militantislammonitor.org/article/id/3847

"While it was almost completely ignored by the media the October 13 sentencing of Ghassan Elashi on 21 charges of terrorism, should represent a huge crack in CAIR's public persona, if only for the simple reason that Elashi was the founder of the Texas chapter of CAIR though his terror ties go beyond that." http://www.pipelinenews.org/2007/Ghassan-Elashi's-Sentencing-Proves-CAIR's-Terror-Ties.html

Having been so designated in such a high level terrorism prosecution many feel led to the FBI severing all relationships with the organization. According to counter terrorism expert Steven Emerson "ISNA is closely linked to the Egyptian terror group the Muslim Brotherhood." [source, http://www.pipelinenews.org/2009/ISNA-Co-Conspirator-In-Hamas-Terror-Trial-Participates.html]

About Zazour assuming the Secretary General position, ISNA's president Ingrid Mattson said, "I am delighted to welcome Safaa Zazour to ISNA's leadership team...I am particularly optimistic that his commitment to the formation of responsible and engaged American Muslim youth will help ISNA develop more services responding to their needs and ample potential."

In a letter to ISNA directors, Zazour writes, "ISNA is on the forefront of identifying issues facing the Muslim community and taking leadership in successfully dealing with these issues. Becoming the Secretary General of ISNA is a tremendous honor and responsibility."

According to Zazour's CAIR bio:

"He is the Chairman of the Council on American Islamic Relations in Chicago, the Chairman of the Council of Islamic Schools in North America, Program Chairman of the ISNA Education Forum, Vice Chairman of Muslim Educational Resources, Information, and Training, a member of the Catholic-Muslim Education Project, member of the Board of Advisors of Play for Peace, member of the Board of Advisors of the Bernadine Center at the Catholic Theological Union, and a member of the Board of Advisors of the School of Education at St. Xavier University." http://www.cairchicago.org/our-board/safaa-zarzour/

The bio of Zazour on the ISNA website omits all mention of CAIR.

http://www.isna.net/ISNAHQ/pages/Safaa-Zarzour.aspx

Zazour's new role as the Secretary General of the Islamic Circle of North America, a group which is touted as moderate and accepted as such by the Obama administration is more proof that the government is reaching out to Islamists. It also shows that there appears to be zero degrees of separation between the Saudi funded Hamas front group CAIR and ISNA. At best they have little concern as to the now obvious linkage that Zazour brings.

Zazour's appointment is one more reason for all groups and individuals which have dealings with ISNA to see their claims to moderation as a sham and shun all dealings with the organization and it's members.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

MIM: The Indiana Governor's office invited Safaa Zazour to attend the State of the State Address.

ISNA Secretary General Invited to Indiana Governor's State of the State Address

ISNA Secretary General Safaa ZarzourOn Tuesday, January 19, ISNA Secretary General Safaa Zarzour attended, along with many other dignitaries and public officials, the State of the State Address given by Governor Mitch Daniels to a joint session of the Indiana House and Senate.

Zarzour was invited by the Governor's Office along with Rafia Zakaria, Associate Executive Director of Muslim Alliance of Indiana, to attend this annual event in which the governor reports on the state of affairs of the State of Indiana to the legislators.

The Governor's speech outlined Indiana's successful efforts to mitigate the negative effects of the world wide economic crisis by investing in its people and exercising sound fiscal policies. He also proposed several electoral and administrative reforms aimed at fairer and more efficient governance. "I am impressed by what I heard from the Governor and look forward to meeting him one-on-one in the future to discuss how ISNA and Hoosiers of the Muslim faith can do their part in the success of their home state," stated Zarzour.

There are an estimated 200,000 Muslims in Indiana and ISNA is one of the most visible symbols of their presence in the state. http://www.isna.net/articles/News/ISNA-Secretary-General-Invited-to-Indiana-Governors-State-of-the-State-Address.aspx

-------------------------------------------------------

MIM: Note that Safaa Zarzour's bio on the ISNA website does not mention his precidency and board membership of Chicago CAIR.

ISNA Announces New Secretary General with Long Record of Service and Achievement

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Source: ISNA

(Plainfield, IN – January 7, 2010) The Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) announces the appointment of Safaa Zarzour as its new secretary general. Mr. Zarzour will move to his new office in Plainfield, IN, from Bridgeview, IL, early next week.

Mr. Zarzour is a lawyer and educator, and has outstanding contributions to integrate Islamic communities and institutions to mainstream American society. He holds a Juris Doctor degree from DePaul University School of Law and a Masters in Education from the University of Illinois in Chicago.

He practiced law in Illinois and is also a passionate educator. He has served as an adjunct professor at Loyola Law School teaching courses in Education and Islamic Law. For over a decade, he served as a teacher and then principal at Universal School, one of the largest PreK-12 independent Islamic schools in the United States.

Mr. Zarzour is active in interfaith circles. He is a member of the Board of Advisors of the Bernadine Center at the Catholic Theological Union in Chicago where he serves along with distinguished faith leaders from the Muslim, Jewish and Christian communities. He has participated for several years in the Mid-Atlantic Muslim-Catholic Dialogue.

"ISNA is on the forefront of identifying issues facing the Muslim community and taking leadership in successfully dealing with these issues," Safa Zarzour pointed out in a letter to ISNA directors. "Becoming the Secretary General of ISNA is a tremendous honor and responsibility," he stressed.

Mr. Zarzour is a well known civic leader in Chicago's Southwest Suburb. He has served in various capacities in his town, including as an administrative coordinator, Zoning Commissioner, and an elected trustee of the Bridgeview Public Library. Over the last 15 years, Mr. Zarzour helped establish and has served on the boards of a variety of local community and advocacy organizations.

His civic and educational work has been featured in many media including 60 Minutes, PBS Front Line, Chicago Tribune, Time Magazine and many others. Mr. Zarzour has received several honors and awards for his public service. Most recently, Chicago's Mayor Richard Daley handed him the Chicago Commission on Human Relations' 2009 Outstanding Service Award.

"I am delighted to welcome Safaa Zarzour to ISNA's leadership team," stated ISNA president Dr. Ingrid Mattson. "Safaa brings a wealth of experience in administration, civic engagement and education. I am particularly optimistic that his commitment to the formation of responsible and engaged American Muslim youth will help ISNA develop more services responding to their needs and ample potential," she added.

See: http://www.isna.net/ISNAHQ/pages/Safaa-Zarzour.aspx.

Contact:
Louay Safi, Director
ISNA Communications and Leadership Development,
louay@isna.net
(317) 838-8130

http://www.isna.net/articles/Press-Releases/ISNA-Announces-New-Secretary-General-with-Long-Record-of-Service-and-Achievement.aspx










----------------------------------------------------------

MIM: Safaa Zarzour's CAIR bio.

Safaa Zarzour is the Administrative Coordinator for the Village of Bridgeview, Illinois. He is also the principal of Zarzour Law Offices, LLC. Mr. Zarzour focuses his law practice in the areas of Local Government, and Non-Profit Law.

Mr. Zarzour holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Mathematics from Arkansas State University (December 1990), a Masters in Education from the University of Illinois in Chicago (May 1996), and a Juris Doctor degree from DePaul University School of Law (December 2003). He also holds teaching certificates from the States of Louisiana (1993) and Illinois (1994) a General School Administration Certificate in Illinois (1996). Mr. Zarzour was named to the Dean's list for the fall, 2000 semester at DePaul Law School. He also was a semi-finalist in DePaul's Negotiation Competition in October, 2000, and a finalist in DePaul's Client Counseling Competition in February, 2001. Mr. Zarzour is a member of the Bars of the State of Illinois, and the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. He is also a member of the Illinois State Bar Association.

Upon his admission to the Illinois Bar in May 2004, Mr. Zarzour joined the law firm of Odelson & Sterk, Ltd., as an associate attorney. For the next three years at the law firm, Mr. Zarzour served as the prosecutor of several local municipalities and represented municipal clients in numerous civil law suits, labor hearings, negotiations, and arbitrations.

Prior to his law career, Mr. Zarzour was an educator for over 12 years. He taught Mathematics for three years in Louisiana and Illinois and served as a Principal of the Universal School, one of the largest PreK-12 independent Islamic Schools in the United States. During his tenure the school tripled its enrollment and became a leader among Islamic schools in North America. Mr. Zarzour continues to serve on the Board of Directors of the Universal School today.

Mr. Zarzour has served in various capacities in his village including as a Zoning Commissioner, and an elected public library trustee. He was elected Commissioner of the Bridgeview Park District in 2006. In addition Mr. Zarzour actively serves on variety of non-profit boards. He is the Chairman of the Council on American Islamic Relations in Chicago, the Chairman of the Council of Islamic Schools in North America, Program Chairman of the ISNA Education Forum, Vice Chairman of Muslim Educational Resources, Information, and Training, a member of the Catholic-Muslim Education Project, member of the Board of Advisors of Play for Peace, member of the Board of Advisors of the Bernadine Center at the Catholic Theological Union, and a member of the Board of Advisors of the School of Education at St. Xavier University.

Mr. Zarzour has participated as a presenter at numerous educational conferences in several states in the U.S. as well as in Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, and South Africa. He has conducted workshops on legal as well as educational issues including school governance, legal compliance, curriculum, staff and program evaluation for educators.

Mr. Zarzour's work has been featured in many media including 60 Minutes, PBS Front Line, Chicago Tribune, Time Magazine and many others. http://www.cairchicago.org/our-board/safaa-zarzour/

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Myrick, Shadegg, Broun, Franks call for CAIR Investigations

10/14/09

US Representatives Sue Myrick (NC-09), John Shadegg (AZ-03), Paul Broun (GA-10) and Trent Franks (AZ-02) today called on federal officials to investigate the actions and non-profit status of the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR).

In a memo obtained through Paul Sperry's newest book Muslim Mafia: Inside the Secret Underworld that's Conspiring to Islamize America, CAIR lays out plans to place interns in the Committees on the Judiciary, Intelligence, and Homeland Security for the purpose of influencing policy.

In 2008, CAIR was named as a co-conspirator in the Holy Land Foundation terrorism case in Dallas, Texas, which led to guilty verdicts on 108 charges based on funneling more than $12 million to HAMAS. Later that year, the FBI cut all ties with CAIR. In response to these recent claims in Muslim Mafia, Myrick, Shadegg, Broun and Franks call on:

1) The US Department of Justice to share with each member of Congress and their Chiefs of Staff an executive summary of the findings that led them to name CAIR as a co-conspirator in a terrorism case;

2) The House Sergeant at Arms to work with the Staff Directors and Committee Chairmen of the House Judiciary, Homeland Security and Intelligence Committees to see if CAIR was successful in placing interns in any of said committees since the drafting of this memo in January of 2007;

3) The Internal Revenue Service to launch a full investigation into the legality of the lobbying activities of CAIR to judge if they are in violation of their federal non-profit status.

"It's frightening to think that an organization with clear-cut ties to terrorism could have a hand in influencing policy – especially national security policy – within our government," said Rep. Myrick. "The investigations that we're asking for are simple, and I'm hopeful that they will bring to light any and all information regarding the goals of CAIR."

"I urge Americans to read, listen and inform themselves about the threat of radical Islam," said Rep. Shadegg. "Muslim Mafia is just one of many books that highlight the infiltration of radical Islamists into our society and the dangers that this poses. The authors make and document a number of very troubling allegations about CAIR that Members of Congress should be aware of and should be investigated by the Justice Department and the Internal Revenue Service."

"Freedom is precious and we must be vigilant in our protection of it," said Rep. Broun. "As a Marine, member of the House Homeland Security Committee, and member of the Anti-Terrorism Caucus, I believe allegations that CAIR has targeted members of Congress on security related committees must not go uninvestigated. I want to thank my colleagues for continuing to educate the public about CAIR's connections to the terrorist organization HAMAS and most recently for bringing attention to more allegations that surround this non-profit. The U.S. Justice Department must share the findings that led them to name CAIR as a co-conspirator in a terrorism case with Congressional offices. I call on the IRS to launch a full investigation into CAIR's eligibility for a non-profit status. Finally, I encourage the House Sgt. at Arms to work with congressional staff to see if CAIR was successful in placing interns in any security related committees."

"The United States is at critical crossroads in U.S. foreign policy and national security," said Rep. Franks. "We live in a post-9/11 world where the coincidence of nuclear proliferation and Islamic terrorism pose a very dangerous combination and real threat to America's national security. The Holy Land Foundation Trial clearly showed that CAIR was established to support the goals of the Palestine Committee, the Muslim Brotherhood's base for support in the U.S. It is time for CAIR's leadership to acknowledge and renounce their ties to this Committee and its Islamic terrorist affiliates. Moreover, they should finally publicly state that they do not support the political agenda of groups such as HAMAS or the Muslim Brotherhood, which include the destruction of Israel and establishment of an Islamic state in the U.S. I take the charges levied against CAIR and laid out in this book very seriously because they affect our national security. This Congress must be deliberate in taking a strong stance against those groups and organizations that align themselves with terrorists, and standing with organizations that are standing against Islamic extremism and terrorism, and are committed to protecting and preserving the cause of freedom we treasure so deeply in America. Asking the Justice Department to take a long, hard look at the underlying positions of CAIR, its actions, and its affiliations is one critically important step in this process."

Attached are two documents: the 2007 CAIR memo and background information on the ties between CAIR and HAMAS

http://myrick.house.gov/index.cfm?sectionid=22&sectiontree=21,22&itemid=325

The Foundation for Islamic Education in Villanova and the Saudi Wahhabists



Badr Al-Olayan, 2nd left, Abdul Rahman Al-Jomaih, and Abdul Aziz Hanafi, (FIE treasurer ) right, distribute certificates and prizes to outstanding students during the graduation ceremony at JCCI auditorium. (AN photo) article below : http://www.arabnews.com/?page=1&section=0&article=61867&d=10&m=4&y=2005

Saudi Wahhabists Promoting Islamic Extremism Through Villanova Jihad Camps

By Beila Rabinowitz and William Meyer

http://www.pipelinenews.org/

July 12, 2006 - Villanova, PA - PipeLineNews.org - The heavy hand of the Saudi Kingdom is being felt in Villanova, Pennsylvania.

When Villanova's Foundation for Islamic Education [FIE] requested an expansion permit from Lower Merion Council they were met with protests from concerned residents who were fed up with the group's flaunting of its zoning agreement.

As we noted in a July 10 piece - Residents Protest Expansion Of Islamic Center In Villanova, PA - Venue For Young Muslim "Jihad Camps" - "Residents of Lower Merion County protesting the expansion of the Foundation for Islamic Education because of zoning violations, recently became aware that the center is planning to hold a Muslim Youth camp with many of the controversial speakers who appeared at a self-described "Jihad Camp" in 2001.

The FIE is funded and owned by the ex-Saudi Minister of Energy and Electricity - Abdullah Taiba and is a satellite campus of the American Open University the American division of al-Azhar University in Cairo, a hotbed of Muslim Brotherhood activity.

A hearing on the expansion permit is scheduled to take place on August 10. Even prior to the news about the camp, Lower Merion councilman Philip Rosenzweig conceded that "it would take time for the FIE to reestablish trust with the neighbors," according to a July 5th article Philadelphia Inquirer..."

The FIE acknowledged they had violated the rules, but what they didn't tell residents is that their Foundation is a satellite campus of the radical Islamist Al-Azhar University [Cairo, Egypt].

FIE's Pennsylvania's incorporation filing for FIE lists the following corporate officers:

  • Mahmoud A. Taiba - President
  • Abdulaziz A. Hanafi - Secretary
  • Abdullah I. al-Hobayb - Treasurer
  • Mahmoud Abdullah Taiba, President of FIE epitomizes the Saudi mixture of finance and fundamentalism. Taiba, an engineer by profession is the chairman of the Saudi Consolidated Electric Company and the former Secretary General of the Saudi Energy and Electricity Ministry.

    In 2005 he was appointed by King Fahd to be the new vice chairman of the Shoura Council. The Majlis Ash Shoura [Council of Consultation] evaluates most matters in the kingdom for their compatibility with Islamic law. Decisions made by the Shoura council are implemented upon the review of King Fahd.

    Taiba is therefore a key player in the inner workings of Saudi Arabia's official religion, which is the Wahhabist Sunni sect of Islam, Islam's most fundamentalist, intolerant strain.

    It also makes Villanova's FIE is a direct extension of the Saudi government, controlled by the Saudi royal family whose goal is to promote Wahhabism worldwide.

    The image to the above left shows, left to right - Badr Al-Olayan, Abdul Rahman Al-Jomaih and FIE Treasurer Abdul Aziz Hanafi as they distribute certificates and prizes to outstanding students during a graduation ceremony held for recent Islamic converts.

    Abdulaziz A. Hanafi is among the most influential businessmen in Saudi Arabia; the above image appeared in an Arab News article, "IEF Director Refutes Reports of Forced Conversions" which details the Philippine government's investigation into reports that its workers in Saudi Arabia had been forcibly converted to Islam and recruited by terrorist organizations [an April 2005 Dept. of State report lists the Abu Sayyaf Group - ASF - as a "violent Muslim terrorist group operating in the southern Philippines...The ASG engages in kidnappings for ransom, bombings, beheadings, assassinations, and extortion"].

    Forced conversion is a recurring charge made against radical Islam, it occurs in nearly every Islamic state, please see our June 1, 2005 article Multiculturalism And The Phenomenon Of Forced Conversion To Islam. We take the charges lodged against the FIE's Saudi headquarters very seriously.

    To the already established transgressions of FIE, developed in our above linked July 10th article we now must add the influence that the Saudi based Islamic Education Foundation is exercising through FIE, to the mix.

    While in no way alleging that those at FIE are actively engaged in terrorism, the philosophy that they espouse is Wahhabism, they are an adjunct of a Saudi hate factory Al-Azhar University that is a focal point of the Muslim Brotherhood and they are a puppet of the Saudi government.

    The Brotherhood is the group responsible for the assassination of Anwar Sadat [the "Blind Sheik" Abdul Rahman the Imam who was convicted in the first World Trade Center bombing and Ayman al-Zawahiri, bin-Laden's top lieutenant both were implicated in the plot to kill Sadat] and it is the immediate predecessor to al-Qaeda.

    What we are talking about here is an ideology that has declared war on the West.

    FIE's camp programs prior to 2001 were actually called "jihad camps," the speakers list on the current camp contains troubling people including Siraj Wahhaj who was named as an unindicted co-conspirator in the 1993 plot to blow up New York landmarks. He also testified as a character witness for the above referenced Blind Sheik in his terrorism trial.

    FIE has been an exceedingly poor neighbor and the information that we set forth in this piece only deepens our concern leading us to demand that FIE's requested permit be denied by the Lower Merion Council, that a thorough investigation be made and proceedings to shut the place down be initiated.

    School Development Paradigm

    School can be interpreted as a quality school Namu in my application even the application of all the circles that in the superior category of implied expectations of what can be expected of students after leaving school. Expectations were none other than the very important and much needed by parents, governments, communities and even by students themselves is the extent to which the output (output) that schools have the intellectual capacity, moral and skills that can be useful for society.

    To address it, we must change the system for learning that is applicable in all education levels of the captivity student teachers in implementing the funding PBM, I as a teacher at SMA Negeri 1 Bulukumba has changed consistently since January 2006. I mean the system is the system where students and teachers have pursued targets in terms of curriculum requires teachers who completed all materials in the curriculum regardless of students' learning exhaustiveness, besides the belief that it is a transformation belajr knowledge (Transfer of knowlwdge).

    On the winning side of any system should not be applied to what the expectations of students, parents, government, society and even we as teachers and educators can be achieved. Let's together change all that by developing the Learning How to Learn (Murphi, 1992) or learning how to learn, meaning that learning is not only a transformation of knowledge but more important is to prepare students to learn more distant from the sources they had found from own experience, the experience of others or the environment where he grew up to develop the potential and the development itself or in other words, in fact, learning how to articulate the knowledge-knowledge of students into the reality of life is and that will be faced by students.

    In private schools in terms of development towards a superior school (grade school) in addition to these changes are still many things that need to be considered include: facilities and infrastructure, schooling Menejmen, Vision and Mission School, Teacher Professionalism and others. For Professionalism does not mean control of most tatapi knowledge is more important is how to make students learn, teachers and students create a simplified tidat Agat GEP, the behavior of teachers who made students alienated or separated from his teacher, the teacher and students must be established communication to the learning process is students criticized the openness of opinion and expression. Because it is not impossible to influence the development of technology students are smarter than the teacher.

    That is my assumption about the development of superior school, hopefully, the government including fellow professionals can menerapka it develop even further.

    Analytic philosophy And Education

    1. Basic Concepts

    One of the latest developments in philosophy of science called "Analytic Philosophy". Analytic philosophy is not a systematic filafat as Idealism, Realism, or pragmatism. Indeed, most analytic philosophers worked carefully to shed his identity as a systematic philosophy, they argue that the approach in the philosophy of the system brings more problems than provide solutions to human problems (Knight: 1982). The majority of analytical philosophers to find a way to clarify the language, concepts, and methods used are more appropriate for the activities of life, such as in science. Efforts expanded analytic philosophy in other areas such as education.

    "Clarification" is a common theme in analytic philosophy simple. The assumption underlying the analysts are most problems in philosophy in the past was not really focusing on the problem last fact or truth, goodness and beauty; but the problems are on the ambiguity of language, or uncertainties ketidaklurusan meaning, and a confusing concept. True knowledge, as claimed by analytic philosophy is a matter of science (business of science) rather than a philosophy. Real rules of the philosophy is "a critical clarification". Therefore, analytic philosophy turned away from the roles that philosophy is speculative, prescriptive, and synthesis. Analytic philosophy refuses to develop philosophical theories.

    Analytic philosophy may be better seen as a rebellion against the objectives and methods of traditional philosophy. Analytic philosophy rather than as a form of philosophy, but rather on a philosophical approach. Analytic movement in philosophy is not a systematic philosophy such as idealism and pragmatism. Philosophy is not interested in making metaphysical statements, epistemology, or axiology statement. Instead of the analytic philosophers believe that these statements only add to the confusion of mankind. The problems of the past as claimed by the analysts, not the real problem about the reality of the end (ultimate reality), the truth, and value, but the problems related to confusion in the language and meaning. Inaccuracies in using the language and meaning is not clear is the center of philosophical confusion. Many philosophical problems caused by the use of language that "poor / irregular".

    Model analytic philosophy consists of two major groups namely:

    1. Analytic LINGUISTIC

    Analytic model implies that linguistic philosophy as logical analysis of language and explanation of the meaning of the term. The analytic philosophers use linguistic methods to explain the meaning of a word and use of language. Some philosophers say that the analysis of the meaning of language is the main task of philosophy and the concept of task analysis as the sole function of philosophy. Analytic philosophers like GEMoore, Bertrand Russell, G. Ryle, others argue that the purpose of philosophy is to remove ambiguities, vagueness in a way to explain the meaning of terms or expressions are used in science and in everyday life. They hold that the language of philosophers is a laboratory, where the seeds and develop ideas. According to Wittgenstein, without the use of the language of logic, the statements would be meaningless.

    Linguistic analytic philosophy is not a building knowledge, but rather an activity aimed at clarifying the terms used. Among analytic philosophers-philosophers will appear differences but they still have the same goal, namely the use of clear language and clear. Analytic philosophers tend to be skeptical, cautious and tend to have no desire to build a school in the system of thinking. Today dominate the analytic approach of philosophy in America and England. In mainland Europe in general is still valid speculative approach.

    It can not be assumed, that realism is the origin of the analytic philosophy movement, but in this case despite that, there is a very close resemblance and strong. Analytic philosophy initially had a long history since the days of Greece. Socrates was a concern that the terms and concepts must be understood as it should. Aristotels has an interest in defining the words he used. For philosophers before the 20th century, the analysis is a means to clarify the language so that the implications of the postulates of philosophy can be understood. Analytic philosophers more attention to the proper use of language so that they can reach the goal statements with the meaning of reality and a different analytic kebenaran.Filosof see appropriate use of language as an end in itself. Analytic philosophy does not make the arguments, but more interested in clarifying the proper meaning of the arguments that were written by someone else.

    Linguistic analysis has evolved in the early 20th century England. This is driven by Bettrand Russell and Alfred North Whitehead in his Principia Mathematica. Russell and Whitehead uses the language of mathematics to logic. Their ideas is that mathematics has a clarity and logic can not be found in the use of general language. George Edward Moore mngambil a slightly different way with Whitehead danRussell, claiming that the analysis of ordinary language (ordinary language) and common understanding (common sense), which is more than the scientific-mathematical language, should be the main point in linguistic analysis. Perhaps the most influential people of the analytic movement is Ludwig Wittgenstein, who has published his work in his Logico-Philosophicus Tractatus in the early 20th century. Wittgenstein in his youth influenced by his teacher and then Russell has influenced the philosopher-positivistic philosophers association Vienna (Vienna Circle)

    2. Positivistic analytic LOGICAL

    Positivism is one of the main roots of modern philosophy in addition to linguistic analysis. The French postivitis-19th century, under the leadership of Auguste Comte, holds that knowledge (knowledge) should be based on the perception of taste (sense perception) and investigation of knowledge (science) that objective, therefore, positivism has limited knowledge of the statements and facts which can be observed and the things associated with it, and reject the worldview or metaphysical world view that contains elements that can not be verified empirically. Negative attitude towards any sense of reality outside (sense) humans have been affecting many areas of modern thought, including pragmatism, behaviorism, scientific naturalism, and the analytic movement. Positivism became a gathering place for the 20th-century group of scientists known as the "Society of Vienna (Vienna Circle)". This group consists of scientists mathematician, logician symbols (symbolic logician) is interested in the philosophical. Vienna associations are seen as a philosophy of science and logic of their thinking of what became known as logical positivism. The main purpose of this group is to find a terminological and conceptual system that is inclusive, but general (apply) to all science. It should be noted that analytic philosophy is an umbrella term (umbrella term) that includes several slightly different positions which are usually referred to positvisme logical, logical empiricism, aanalisis linguistic, logical atomism, and analysis of oxford.

    Basically, logical positivism was thinking that there is no acceptable arguments with meaningful unless it can be verified by formal reasons (ie: logic and mathematics) or verified at the level of empirical, or real data.

    Positivistic analytic model known as the neo logical positivism was developed by Bertrand Russell that is rooted in and continue the positivism of Comte philosophy which is the basis peletak quantitative approach in the development of science (science), with a set of mathematics as a basis for all branches of science.

    Positivism has a strong influence on the scientific method. Positivism concepts contributed new approach in the discovery of scientific truths that gave birth to the revolution paradigm. Principles and procedures in the natural sciences and social sciences, which comes from the assumption of John Stuart Mill (1843), continued to live until now as a methodological paradigm. Mill does not distinguish between the methodology of social science and science kealaman.

    2. Figures and vision

    George Edward Moore (1873-1958)

    A resistance of "common sense (common sense)" is one of the greatest ideas Moore. Essentially, Moore's interested in something we call "ordinary life". Moore believes that the most common sense (common sense) is something right and that we know what we're talking about the habits, language, and common sense. Most philosophers, in addition to Moore, has made a way out of the debate about common sense. However, the two things that ordinary language and in philosophy, there are some statements that they can be proven, and Moore looked like he did that the discovery of truth or falsity of the arguments included not located in a common language and philosophy, but there is at analysis of the meaning of the arguments. With such analysis, Moore thinks that could clarify the way to a better understanding of the meaning of truth and the truth of what we say and we write.

    Illustrations: the words "good", "know", "real". We all know the meaning of these words in everyday life and something reasonable. Moore believes that we already have a concept of "good" already exists in our minds before we use it. , But knows the mind (or a concept) and analyze the meaning / purpose is two different things. Analyzing a membanu meaning we will understand more precisely and clearly the meaning of it, or in other words we can call it "good fit / match".

    Bertrand Russell (1872-1970)

    If Moore is credited with analytic philosophy that tries to analyze the intentions of common words and common sense, Russell developed a formal logic analysis is a science friendly and having an appropriate vocabulary. In his Principia Mathematica, written by Russell and Alferd, math can be simplified to a language of logic. Russell ensure that mathematics gives us a clarity and logic that can not be found in the use of language in general, we need to try to make it more precise and clear. Aristotle called this concept with a method syllogism (deductive argument). Illustrations: "If the rain, the wet road" consists of two clauses "if the rain" and "wet roads", second clause by Russell called implications.

    Both Moore and Russell put forward a strong relationship that the analysis is closely related to the philosophy of realism, Moore argues forcefully and clearly that the analysis of the words used from the facts and awareness of the experience. While Russell firmly using a scientific approach and logical, orderly, and systematic. The movement is still oriented analytic philosophy of realism, although the modern philosophy reject the system.

    Ludwig Wittgenstein (1889-1951)

    In his book Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, Ludwig argued that the natural sciences is the main source of the truth of the proposition and the main purpose of the discovery of new facts. Philosophy should not see the discovery of truth, but rather an activity to solve the dilemmas, clarify issues, and clarify the ideas that come from sources other. Philosophers should not be focused on themselves with the truth of the data, but must always be connected with "language" and remarks about the data. In conclusion we need to determine what can and can not be said, that's called "limits of language"

    The purpose of analytic philosophy succinctly described by Wittgenstein as follows: Philosophy aims at clarifying the logical philosophy-Philosophy is not a body of doctrine but an activity, a philosophical work consists essentially of a description - Philosophy does not produce the arguments of philosophy (philosophical Prepositions) but more to the clarification of these propositions - is the task of philosophy is to make clear and give the boundaries clear on something.

    Positivism Adherents believe that all "analytic expressions" are in fact formal logic-that the sentence was due tersbut sentence structure, and all synthetic statements belong in science, providing the empirical investigation for validity.

    3. Implications In Education

    In linguistic analytical approach, for testing rationality associated with ideas or ideas of education, and examine how the consistency with other ideas. For example we introduce the concept of "active students how to learn". By using the grammar and logic, we examine these concepts by analyzing tertenu perspective. Analytic approach to test linguistic logically educational concepts such as "whole person", "goal pedidikan", "lifelong education", maturity ", etc..

    In the context of logical positivistic approach, according Kunto Wibisono (1997), positivism is a model in the development of science (knowledge) that in the step through how to work through observation, experimentation, and comparison as kealaman applied in science, and the model developed in science social sciences. Positivism to use precision, verifiabilitas, confirm, and experimentation with the optimal degree (Saduyoh: 22), with as far as possible be able to predict the optimal degree too. Thus the scientific truth and success is measured by positivistic education, in the sense of right and true must be concrete, exact, accurate, and provide benefit.

    Understand the implications of positivism in the development of education science education science does not know the whole, but that there are educational sciences such as: educational psychology, sociology, education, educational administration, etc.. These sciences is the application of pure science as basic science. Positivism is a scientific approach to quantitative models in science, its adherents call themselves the scientific paradigmatic.

    Other implications of analytic philosophy by RSPeters (a leading analytic philosopher), suggests that the philosophy of education consists of the formulation of high-level (high level) that will guide educational practices and forms of school organization. In other words, the function of philosophy of education has traditionally been developed and determine the path of education and practice built and fit with the view that philosophy is based on a specific outlook with regard to the nature of reality (nature of reality), the truth, and value. This approach seems to be contrary to the founding of Wittgenstein, who at the beginning of his career declared that metaphysical statements were "nonsense" (nonsense).

    The question is: what value, usability, and function of philosophy of education for the analyst? The answer has been given by Peters which claimed that one of the main preoccupations for the analytic philosopher is to design guidelines for the high level of education. Basically, Peters and his friends declared that the role of philosophy of education is not to develop the "isms" or a new educational ideology, but to help us better understand the meaning of our present ideology. The benefits to be achieved by the student / students, parents, teachers, administrative staff, and the public from such a clarification would be a more meaningful approach to the educational process. Analysts argue that many educational problems lies in their own language poblem. Therefore, if we can solve the language problem, we can better describe the problem of education.

    The analysts may give attention to the statements of common (typical) such as, "teachers should provide a real-life experiences of students" or "curriculum" should be based on real life situations ". First, these statements should be known as prescriptive. Second, the descriptive terms "real life experience" and "like a real life" must be tested to determine meaning. The term "life" is a description of all activities of mankind. One of the human activities that now is the "conjugate" verb. However, when the statement is often used, the "decline" is not a verb yan as intended, for the exercises grammar is not considered "like real life", but if the grammar is part of "life" why it is not included in preskepsi it?

    Analysts philosophy is not only interested in mengklarifkasi language educators (educator), but also in clarifying the conceptual tools (devides conceptual) which is used by educators, advance use, estimates the underlying, and the goals of analytic tercakup.Filsafat give attention to the analysis of "the concept of education", "training concept", "the concept of child-centered" (concept of child centered), and other concepts, including goals, culture, curriculum, liberal education, state and indoctrination, the determination of value (value-judgment), values, morals, and freedom, and the authority.

    The analyst not only to avoid to use prescriptive statements about what is possible and not possible for students, but they also avoid statements regarding the value of such activity above. For example, we note that the advice was issued by the authority of certain schools that elementary school students should read, befikir, or learn, then test analisakan what we mean by reading, thinking, or learning. He is not going to do (give prescriptive) or make a decision value; its function is to clarify the analysis.

    One area in which the analysis moves in the development of educational models that help us clarify and develop our concepts. This is considered to be related to strategies to help us in "language games" are specific. They also developed a theoretical model unuk help the teachers who have a particular problem. They noted that scientists often develop a theory before engaging in an activity. Analysts claim that it will be followed by something similar to assist in teaching. The use of these models can help to eliminate ambiguity, and because it will help in the education profession.

    4. Criticism of Analytic Philosophy

    Flsafat analytic on one side has a number of significant weaknesses, if the analysis is seen as a means to philosophize.

    First criticism: there are many criticisms that analytic philosophy is too narrow and limited to answer such a huge demand of modern life, community, and education. Analytic philosophy in an effort to achieve clarity and precision, has been seen by some people as an attempt to escape from a very important problem of this century and the problems of philosophy which is eternal.

    The second criticism; analytic philosophy create confusion between "medium" and "objective" philosophies. Confusion associated with "means" and "objective", John Wild illustrated as "someone who was so interested in the point and dust stains on the glasses that he lost all interest in seeing the other through these glasses. In penelusurannya for clarification and accuracy, analytic philosophy often exaggerate the philosophy and techniques in certain situations lead philosophers become "technicians" are highly skilled. Someone might ask the analytic philosophers, if clarification of what we do will be worth if we make a mistake from the beginning. An analytic philosopher felt this issue and noted that "a certain systematic ambiguity is more desirable than an artificial precision". In another context, when the philosopher stopped to talk about metaphysical questions, and axiology, while others such as the Social and Physical Sciences will continue to make statements and theorems concerned with the lives and livelihoods. Someone is not going apart from the basic questions facing the human race "with only" define it in ways that out of the definition of the philosophy.

    The third criticism; analytic philosophy as a total approach to issues rooted philosophy of blindness to the estimates - estimates metaphysics and epistemology. On the one hand, analysts generally avoids a priori assumptions. On the other hand, when they insisted that any term descriptive or factual should be in the language of science and that the arguments must be verified by a sensory observations, they assumed a metaphysical doctrine according to materialism, realism, and positivism. With things like the above, the metaphysical and epistemological them, whether consciously chosen or not, is open to the same criticism as this philosophical position.

    Another criticism made against positivism understood delivered by Lincoln and Guba in Uyoh (2004), that positivism produces research with human respondents, but less attention to humanity. This can be said that the positivism approach does not have ethical implications, but it was less successful working positivism of empirical and conceptual formulation of the various fields of science (especially the social sciences and humanities).
     
    Mambaus Sholihin @2009 Gallery Template Ajah by ireng_ajah

    Supported Free Money Info and Product and Service

    Best view with Mozilla Firefox